Cook Islands vs Nauru: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Cook Islands
0.7
in 2023
Nauru
0.7
in 2023
Cook Islands rank
190th
Nauru rank
190th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Cook Islands
- Nauru
How they compare
Cook Islands currently reports 0.7 against 0.7 in Nauru, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cook Islands ahead.
Cook Islands ranks 190th and Nauru ranks 190th of 193 countries.
Cook Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.81 | 0.5 | 0.31 | Cook Islands |
| 2010s | 0.9 | 0.53 | 0.37 | Cook Islands |
| 2020s | 0.775 | 0.625 | 0.15 | Cook Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Cook Islands or Nauru?
- Cook Islands, at 0.7 against 0.7 in Nauru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Cook Islands and Nauru?
- 0, with Cook Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Nauru?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cook Islands and Nauru rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Cook Islands ranks 190th and Nauru ranks 190th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.