Congo vs United Arab Emirates: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Congo
689.6
in 2023
United Arab Emirates
713
in 2023
Congo rank
85th
United Arab Emirates rank
84th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Congo
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 713 against 689.6 in Congo, a difference of 23.4.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 85th and United Arab Emirates ranks 84th of 193 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 501.04 | 271.47 | 229.57 | Congo |
| 2010s | 607.07 | 533.89 | 73.18 | Congo |
| 2020s | 666.05 | 663.65 | 2.4 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Congo or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 713 against 689.6 in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Congo and United Arab Emirates?
- 23.4, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and United Arab Emirates?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Congo and United Arab Emirates rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Congo ranks 85th and United Arab Emirates ranks 84th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.