Congo vs Papua New Guinea: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Congo
689.6
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
771.2
in 2023
Congo rank
85th
Papua New Guinea rank
83rd
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Congo
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 771.2 against 689.6 in Congo, a difference of 81.6.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 85th and Papua New Guinea ranks 83rd of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 501.04 | 410.12 | 90.92 | Congo |
| 2010s | 607.07 | 561.3 | 45.77 | Congo |
| 2020s | 666.05 | 724.05 | 58 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Congo or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 771.2 against 689.6 in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Congo and Papua New Guinea?
- 81.6, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Papua New Guinea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Papua New Guinea rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Congo ranks 85th and Papua New Guinea ranks 83rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.