Congo vs Mauritania: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Congo
689.6
in 2023
Mauritania
662.6
in 2023
Congo rank
85th
Mauritania rank
87th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Congo
- Mauritania
How they compare
Congo currently reports 689.6 against 662.6 in Mauritania, a difference of 27.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 85th and Mauritania ranks 87th of 193 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 501.04 | 378.52 | 122.52 | Congo |
| 2010s | 607.07 | 490.25 | 116.82 | Congo |
| 2020s | 666.05 | 622.62 | 43.42 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Congo or Mauritania?
- Congo, at 689.6 against 662.6 in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Congo and Mauritania?
- 27, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mauritania?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Mauritania rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Congo ranks 85th and Mauritania ranks 87th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.