Comoros vs Solomon Islands: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Comoros
61.6
in 2023
Solomon Islands
64.3
in 2023
Comoros rank
160th
Solomon Islands rank
159th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Comoros
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 64.3 against 61.6 in Comoros, a difference of 2.7.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 160th and Solomon Islands ranks 159th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.44 | 34.07 | 4.37 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 45.56 | 44.93 | 0.63 | Comoros |
| 2020s | 57.7 | 59.98 | 2.27 | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Comoros or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 64.3 against 61.6 in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Comoros and Solomon Islands?
- 2.7, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Solomon Islands?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Solomon Islands rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Comoros ranks 160th and Solomon Islands ranks 159th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.