Comoros vs Maldives: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Comoros
61.6
in 2023
Maldives
49.9
in 2023
Comoros rank
160th
Maldives rank
163rd
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Comoros
- Maldives
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 61.6 against 49.9 in Maldives, a difference of 11.7.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.2 times Maldives's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 160th and Maldives ranks 163rd of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 2 and Maldives in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.44 | 36.65 | 1.79 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 45.56 | 45.59 | 0.03 | Maldives |
| 2020s | 57.7 | 49.27 | 8.43 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Comoros or Maldives?
- Comoros, at 61.6 against 49.9 in Maldives as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Comoros and Maldives?
- 11.7, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Maldives?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Maldives rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Comoros ranks 160th and Maldives ranks 163rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.