Chile vs Congo: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Chile
775.2
in 2023
Congo
689.6
in 2023
Chile rank
82nd
Congo rank
85th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Chile
- Congo
How they compare
Chile currently reports 775.2 against 689.6 in Congo, a difference of 85.6.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Congo ahead.
Chile ranks 82nd and Congo ranks 85th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 342.73 | 501.04 | 158.31 | Congo |
| 2010s | 483.92 | 607.07 | 123.15 | Congo |
| 2020s | 709.12 | 666.05 | 43.08 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Chile or Congo?
- Chile, at 775.2 against 689.6 in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Chile and Congo?
- 85.6, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Congo?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Congo rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Chile ranks 82nd and Congo ranks 85th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.