Burundi vs Zimbabwe: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Burundi
1,237
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1,177
in 2023
Burundi rank
69th
Zimbabwe rank
71st
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Burundi
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 1,237 against 1,177 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 60.
That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Burundi ranks 69th and Zimbabwe ranks 71st of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 477.81 | 986.15 | 508.34 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 702.48 | 921.75 | 219.27 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1,104 | 1,099 | 5.52 | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Burundi or Zimbabwe?
- Burundi, at 1,237 against 1,177 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Burundi and Zimbabwe?
- 60, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Zimbabwe rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Burundi ranks 69th and Zimbabwe ranks 71st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.