Botswana vs Uruguay: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Botswana
210.7
in 2023
Uruguay
199.2
in 2023
Botswana rank
128th
Uruguay rank
131st
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Botswana
- Uruguay
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 210.7 against 199.2 in Uruguay, a difference of 11.5.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uruguay ahead.
Botswana ranks 128th and Uruguay ranks 131st of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 149.13 | 150.94 | 1.81 | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 162.94 | 164.79 | 1.85 | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 198.43 | 190.85 | 7.58 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Botswana or Uruguay?
- Botswana, at 210.7 against 199.2 in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Botswana and Uruguay?
- 11.5, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Uruguay?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Uruguay rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Botswana ranks 128th and Uruguay ranks 131st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.