Botswana vs Republic of Moldova: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Botswana
210.7
in 2023
Republic of Moldova
204.3
in 2023
Botswana rank
128th
Republic of Moldova rank
129th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Botswana
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 210.7 against 204.3 in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 6.4.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Botswana ranks 128th and Republic of Moldova ranks 129th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Moldova in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 149.13 | 290.47 | 141.34 | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 162.94 | 213.46 | 50.52 | Republic of Moldova |
| 2020s | 198.43 | 195.43 | 3 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Botswana or Republic of Moldova?
- Botswana, at 210.7 against 204.3 in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Botswana and Republic of Moldova?
- 6.4, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Republic of Moldova?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Republic of Moldova rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Botswana ranks 128th and Republic of Moldova ranks 129th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.