Botswana vs Lesotho: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Botswana
210.7
in 2023
Lesotho
217.3
in 2023
Botswana rank
128th
Lesotho rank
127th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Botswana
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 217.3 against 210.7 in Botswana, a difference of 6.6.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lesotho ahead.
Botswana ranks 128th and Lesotho ranks 127th of 193 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 149.13 | 138.58 | 10.55 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 162.94 | 136.65 | 26.29 | Botswana |
| 2020s | 198.43 | 196.43 | 2 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Botswana or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 217.3 against 210.7 in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Botswana and Lesotho?
- 6.6, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Lesotho?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Lesotho rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Botswana ranks 128th and Lesotho ranks 127th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.