Barbados vs Malta: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Barbados
13.1
in 2023
Malta
19.1
in 2023
Barbados rank
173rd
Malta rank
171st
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Barbados
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 19.1 against 13.1 in Barbados, a difference of 6.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.5 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 173rd and Malta ranks 171st of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.37 | 11.46 | 3.91 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 12.18 | 12.5 | 0.32 | Malta |
| 2020s | 12.72 | 17.9 | 5.17 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Barbados or Malta?
- Malta, at 19.1 against 13.1 in Barbados as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Barbados and Malta?
- 6, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Malta?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Malta rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Barbados ranks 173rd and Malta ranks 171st of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.