Barbados vs Kiribati: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Barbados
13.1
in 2023
Kiribati
9.2
in 2023
Barbados rank
173rd
Kiribati rank
176th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Barbados
- Kiribati
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 13.1 against 9.2 in Kiribati, a difference of 3.9.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.4 times Kiribati's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 173rd and Kiribati ranks 176th of 193 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.37 | 6.22 | 9.15 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 12.18 | 7.57 | 4.61 | Barbados |
| 2020s | 12.72 | 8.72 | 4 | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Barbados or Kiribati?
- Barbados, at 13.1 against 9.2 in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Barbados and Kiribati?
- 3.9, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Kiribati?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Kiribati rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Barbados ranks 173rd and Kiribati ranks 176th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.