Barbados vs Iceland: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Barbados
13.1
in 2023
Iceland
13.5
in 2023
Barbados rank
173rd
Iceland rank
172nd
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Barbados
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 13.5 against 13.1 in Barbados, a difference of 0.4.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 173rd and Iceland ranks 172nd of 193 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.37 | 7.94 | 7.43 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 12.18 | 9.12 | 3.06 | Barbados |
| 2020s | 12.72 | 12.25 | 0.475 | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Barbados or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 13.5 against 13.1 in Barbados as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Barbados and Iceland?
- 0.4, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Iceland?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Iceland rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Barbados ranks 173rd and Iceland ranks 172nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.