Bahamas vs Vanuatu: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Bahamas
19.9
in 2023
Vanuatu
23.6
in 2023
Bahamas rank
170th
Vanuatu rank
167th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Bahamas
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports 23.6 against 19.9 in Bahamas, a difference of 3.7.
That makes Vanuatu's figure about 1.2 times Bahamas's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 170th and Vanuatu ranks 167th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 2 and Vanuatu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.09 | 13.25 | 5.84 | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 17.63 | 17.11 | 0.52 | Bahamas |
| 2020s | 19.25 | 21.95 | 2.7 | Vanuatu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Bahamas or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at 23.6 against 19.9 in Bahamas as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Bahamas and Vanuatu?
- 3.7, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Vanuatu?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Bahamas and Vanuatu rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Bahamas ranks 170th and Vanuatu ranks 167th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.