Bahamas vs Barbados: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Bahamas
19.9
in 2023
Barbados
13.1
in 2023
Bahamas rank
170th
Barbados rank
173rd
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Bahamas
- Barbados
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 19.9 against 13.1 in Barbados, a difference of 6.8.
That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.5 times Barbados's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Bahamas has been ahead every year.
Bahamas ranks 170th and Barbados ranks 173rd of 193 countries.
Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Barbados | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.09 | 15.37 | 3.72 | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 17.63 | 12.18 | 5.45 | Bahamas |
| 2020s | 19.25 | 12.72 | 6.53 | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Bahamas or Barbados?
- Bahamas, at 19.9 against 13.1 in Barbados as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Bahamas and Barbados?
- 6.8, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Barbados?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Bahamas and Barbados rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Bahamas ranks 170th and Barbados ranks 173rd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.