Australia vs Mauritania: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Australia
676.2
in 2023
Mauritania
662.6
in 2023
Australia rank
86th
Mauritania rank
87th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Australia
- Mauritania
How they compare
Australia currently reports 676.2 against 662.6 in Mauritania, a difference of 13.6.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 86th and Mauritania ranks 87th of 193 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 355.23 | 378.52 | 23.29 | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 413.53 | 490.25 | 76.72 | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 607.8 | 622.62 | 14.83 | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Australia or Mauritania?
- Australia, at 676.2 against 662.6 in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Australia and Mauritania?
- 13.6, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mauritania?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Mauritania rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Australia ranks 86th and Mauritania ranks 87th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.