Australia vs Dominican Republic: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Australia
676.2
in 2023
Dominican Republic
649
in 2023
Australia rank
86th
Dominican Republic rank
89th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Australia
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Australia currently reports 676.2 against 649 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 27.2.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Australia ranks 86th and Dominican Republic ranks 89th of 193 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 355.23 | 564.38 | 209.15 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 413.53 | 527.61 | 114.08 | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 607.8 | 616.2 | 8.4 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Australia or Dominican Republic?
- Australia, at 676.2 against 649 in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Australia and Dominican Republic?
- 27.2, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Dominican Republic?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Dominican Republic rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Australia ranks 86th and Dominican Republic ranks 89th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.