Australia vs Congo: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Australia
676.2
in 2023
Congo
689.6
in 2023
Australia rank
86th
Congo rank
85th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Australia
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 689.6 against 676.2 in Australia, a difference of 13.4.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 86th and Congo ranks 85th of 193 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 355.23 | 501.04 | 145.81 | Congo |
| 2010s | 413.53 | 607.07 | 193.54 | Congo |
| 2020s | 607.8 | 666.05 | 58.25 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Australia or Congo?
- Congo, at 689.6 against 676.2 in Australia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Australia and Congo?
- 13.4, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Congo rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Australia ranks 86th and Congo ranks 85th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.