AFR vs Brazil: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
AFR
99,145
in 2023
Brazil
11,832
in 2023
AFR rank
8th
Brazil rank
7th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- AFR
- Brazil
How they compare
AFR currently reports 99,145 against 11,832 in Brazil, a difference of 87,313.
That makes AFR's figure about 8.4 times Brazil's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, AFR has been ahead every year.
AFR ranks 8th and Brazil ranks 7th of 19 groups.
AFR has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AFR | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63,477 | 13,906 | 49,571 | AFR |
| 2010s | 74,940 | 11,549 | 63,390 | AFR |
| 2020s | 93,121 | 11,581 | 81,539 | AFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, AFR or Brazil?
- AFR, at 99,145 against 11,832 in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between AFR and Brazil?
- 87,313, with AFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AFR and Brazil?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do AFR and Brazil rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- AFR ranks 8th and Brazil ranks 7th of 19 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.