AFR vs Bangladesh: Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
AFR
99,145
in 2023
Bangladesh
18,320
in 2023
AFR rank
8th
Bangladesh rank
6th
Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- AFR
- Bangladesh
How they compare
AFR currently reports 99,145 against 18,320 in Bangladesh, a difference of 80,825.
That makes AFR's figure about 5.4 times Bangladesh's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, AFR has been ahead every year.
AFR ranks 8th and Bangladesh ranks 6th of 19 groups.
AFR has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AFR | Bangladesh | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63,477 | 13,033 | 50,444 | AFR |
| 2010s | 74,940 | 15,064 | 59,876 | AFR |
| 2020s | 93,121 | 17,512 | 75,608 | AFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, AFR or Bangladesh?
- AFR, at 99,145 against 18,320 in Bangladesh as of 2023.
- What is the difference in number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between AFR and Bangladesh?
- 80,825, with AFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AFR and Bangladesh?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do AFR and Bangladesh rank globally for number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- AFR ranks 8th and Bangladesh ranks 6th of 19 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.