Bolivia vs Rwanda: Number of pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Bolivia
31.1
in 2019
Rwanda
35.2
in 2019
Bolivia rank
74th
Rwanda rank
72nd
Number of pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Bolivia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 35.2 against 31.1 in Bolivia, a difference of 4.1.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 74th and Rwanda ranks 72nd of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.61 | 28.01 | 3.6 | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 31.95 | 32.05 | 0.1 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Bolivia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 35.2 against 31.1 in Bolivia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in number of pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Bolivia and Rwanda?
- 4.1, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Rwanda?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia and Rwanda rank globally for number of pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Bolivia ranks 74th and Rwanda ranks 72nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.