Barbados vs Iceland: Number of pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Barbados
0.24
in 2019
Iceland
0.26
in 2019
Barbados rank
178th
Iceland rank
177th
Number of pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Barbados
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.26 against 0.24 in Barbados, a difference of 0.02.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 178th and Iceland ranks 177th of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.284 | 0.269 | 0.015 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 0.24 | 0.271 | 0.031 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Barbados or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 0.26 against 0.24 in Barbados as of 2019.
- What is the difference in number of pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Barbados and Iceland?
- 0.02, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Iceland?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Barbados and Iceland rank globally for number of pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Barbados ranks 178th and Iceland ranks 177th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.