Mauritius vs Timor-Leste: Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Mauritius
47.1
in 2019
Timor-Leste
53.4
in 2019
Mauritius rank
153rd
Timor-Leste rank
151st
Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Mauritius
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 53.4 against 47.1 in Mauritius, a difference of 6.3.
That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 153rd and Timor-Leste ranks 151st of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.28 | 31.55 | 4.73 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 41.9 | 44.1 | 2.2 | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Mauritius or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 53.4 against 47.1 in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Mauritius and Timor-Leste?
- 6.3, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Timor-Leste?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Timor-Leste rank globally for number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Mauritius ranks 153rd and Timor-Leste ranks 151st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.