Kiribati vs Samoa: Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Kiribati
5.18
in 2019
Samoa
6.04
in 2019
Kiribati rank
176th
Samoa rank
174th
Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Kiribati
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 6.04 against 5.18 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.86.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 176th and Samoa ranks 174th of 194 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.07 | 5.16 | 1.09 | Samoa |
| 2010s | 4.96 | 5.59 | 0.636 | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Kiribati or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 6.04 against 5.18 in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Kiribati and Samoa?
- 0.86, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Samoa?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Samoa rank globally for number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Kiribati ranks 176th and Samoa ranks 174th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.