Jamaica vs Namibia: Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Jamaica
97
in 2019
Namibia
85.9
in 2019
Jamaica rank
135th
Namibia rank
138th
Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Jamaica
- Namibia
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 97 against 85.9 in Namibia, a difference of 11.1.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 135th and Namibia ranks 138th of 194 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.4 | 67.72 | 24.68 | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 93.07 | 77.06 | 16.01 | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Jamaica or Namibia?
- Jamaica, at 97 against 85.9 in Namibia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Jamaica and Namibia?
- 11.1, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Namibia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Jamaica and Namibia rank globally for number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Jamaica ranks 135th and Namibia ranks 138th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.