Iceland vs Kiribati: Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Iceland
5.41
in 2019
Kiribati
5.18
in 2019
Iceland rank
175th
Kiribati rank
176th
Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Iceland
- Kiribati
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 5.41 against 5.18 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.23.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 175th and Kiribati ranks 176th of 194 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.56 | 4.07 | 0.492 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 5.06 | 4.96 | 0.106 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Iceland or Kiribati?
- Iceland, at 5.41 against 5.18 in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Iceland and Kiribati?
- 0.23, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Kiribati?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Kiribati rank globally for number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Iceland ranks 175th and Kiribati ranks 176th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.