Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Croatia: Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
114
in 2019
Croatia
123
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
129th
Croatia rank
127th
Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Croatia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 123 against 114 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 9.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Croatia ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 129th and Croatia ranks 127th of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Croatia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 139.4 | 137.3 | 2.1 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 124.4 | 128 | 3.6 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Croatia?
- Croatia, at 123 against 114 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia?
- 9, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia rank globally for number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 129th and Croatia ranks 127th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.