Barbados vs Malta: Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Barbados
7.51
in 2019
Malta
8.29
in 2019
Barbados rank
173rd
Malta rank
172nd
Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Barbados
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 8.29 against 7.51 in Barbados, a difference of 0.78.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 173rd and Malta ranks 172nd of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.74 | 7.37 | 1.37 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 7.6 | 7.65 | 0.052 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Barbados or Malta?
- Malta, at 8.29 against 7.51 in Barbados as of 2019.
- What is the difference in number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Barbados and Malta?
- 0.78, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Malta?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Barbados and Malta rank globally for number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Barbados ranks 173rd and Malta ranks 172nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.