Barbados vs Iceland: Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Barbados
7.51
in 2019
Iceland
5.41
in 2019
Barbados rank
173rd
Iceland rank
175th
Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Barbados
- Iceland
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 7.51 against 5.41 in Iceland, a difference of 2.1.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.4 times Iceland's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 173rd and Iceland ranks 175th of 194 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.74 | 4.56 | 4.18 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 7.6 | 5.06 | 2.53 | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Barbados or Iceland?
- Barbados, at 7.51 against 5.41 in Iceland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Barbados and Iceland?
- 2.1, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Iceland?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Barbados and Iceland rank globally for number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Barbados ranks 173rd and Iceland ranks 175th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.