Bahamas vs Barbados: Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia
Bahamas
10.6
in 2019
Barbados
7.51
in 2019
Bahamas rank
170th
Barbados rank
173rd
Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia over time
- Bahamas
- Barbados
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 10.6 against 7.51 in Barbados, a difference of 3.09.
That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.4 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Barbados ahead.
Bahamas ranks 170th and Barbados ranks 173rd of 194 countries.
Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Barbados | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.22 | 8.74 | 0.484 | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 9.64 | 7.6 | 2.05 | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia, Bahamas or Barbados?
- Bahamas, at 10.6 against 7.51 in Barbados as of 2019.
- What is the difference in number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia between Bahamas and Barbados?
- 3.09, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Barbados?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Bahamas and Barbados rank globally for number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia?
- Bahamas ranks 170th and Barbados ranks 173rd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Number of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years) with anaemia (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.