South-East Asia (WHO region) vs Saint Lucia: Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age
South-East Asia (WHO region)
119
in 2019
Saint Lucia
133
in 2019
South-East Asia (WHO region) rank
7th
Saint Lucia rank
4th
Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age over time
- South-East Asia (WHO region)
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 133 against 119 in South-East Asia (WHO region), a difference of 14.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times South-East Asia (WHO region)'s.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
South-East Asia (WHO region) ranks 7th and Saint Lucia ranks 4th of 7 groups.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South-East Asia (WHO region) | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 118.8 | 131.6 | 12.8 | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 119 | 133 | 14 | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age, South-East Asia (WHO region) or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 133 against 119 in South-East Asia (WHO region) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age between South-East Asia (WHO region) and Saint Lucia?
- 14, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South-East Asia (WHO region) and Saint Lucia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do South-East Asia (WHO region) and Saint Lucia rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age?
- South-East Asia (WHO region) ranks 7th and Saint Lucia ranks 4th of 7 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.