Nicaragua vs San Marino: Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age
Nicaragua
131
in 2019
San Marino
131
in 2019
Nicaragua rank
18th
San Marino rank
18th
Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age over time
- Nicaragua
- San Marino
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 131 against 131 in San Marino, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was San Marino ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 18th and San Marino ranks 18th of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 1 and San Marino in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 130 | 131.6 | 1.6 | San Marino |
| 2010s | 131.8 | 131 | 0.8 | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age, Nicaragua or San Marino?
- Nicaragua, at 131 against 131 in San Marino as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age between Nicaragua and San Marino?
- 0, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and San Marino?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Nicaragua and San Marino rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age?
- Nicaragua ranks 18th and San Marino ranks 18th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.