New Zealand vs Philippines: Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age
New Zealand
131
in 2019
Philippines
131
in 2019
New Zealand rank
18th
Philippines rank
18th
Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age over time
- New Zealand
- Philippines
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 131 against 131 in Philippines, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 18th and Philippines ranks 18th of 194 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 132.7 | 127 | 5.7 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 131.9 | 130 | 1.9 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age, New Zealand or Philippines?
- New Zealand, at 131 against 131 in Philippines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age between New Zealand and Philippines?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Philippines?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Philippines rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age?
- New Zealand ranks 18th and Philippines ranks 18th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.