Netherlands vs Rwanda: Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age
Netherlands
131
in 2019
Rwanda
131
in 2019
Netherlands rank
18th
Rwanda rank
18th
Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age over time
- Netherlands
- Rwanda
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 131 against 131 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Netherlands ahead.
Netherlands ranks 18th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 194 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 131.4 | 129.3 | 2.1 | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 131 | 131 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age, Netherlands or Rwanda?
- Netherlands, at 131 against 131 in Rwanda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age between Netherlands and Rwanda?
- 0, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Rwanda?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Netherlands and Rwanda rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age?
- Netherlands ranks 18th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.