Kiribati vs Nauru: Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age
Kiribati
125
in 2019
Nauru
125
in 2019
Kiribati rank
121st
Nauru rank
121st
Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age over time
- Kiribati
- Nauru
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 125 against 125 in Nauru, a difference of 0.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 121st and Nauru ranks 121st of 194 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 124.9 | 125.7 | 0.8 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 125 | 125.6 | 0.6 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age, Kiribati or Nauru?
- Kiribati, at 125 against 125 in Nauru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age between Kiribati and Nauru?
- 0, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Nauru?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Nauru rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age?
- Kiribati ranks 121st and Nauru ranks 121st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.