Jordan vs South Sudan: Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age
Jordan
123
in 2019
South Sudan
123
in 2019
Jordan rank
147th
South Sudan rank
147th
Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age over time
- Jordan
- South Sudan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 123 against 123 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 147th and South Sudan ranks 147th of 194 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 125.5 | 122.7 | 2.8 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 124.2 | 123.9 | 0.3 | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age, Jordan or South Sudan?
- Jordan, at 123 against 123 in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age between Jordan and South Sudan?
- 0, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and South Sudan?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and South Sudan rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age?
- Jordan ranks 147th and South Sudan ranks 147th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.