Guatemala vs Sur: Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age
Guatemala
136
in 2019
Sur
129
in 2019
Guatemala rank
1st
Sur rank
1st
Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age over time
- Guatemala
- Sur
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 136 against 129 in Sur, a difference of 7.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Sur's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 1st and Sur ranks 1st of 194 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 130.8 | 127.5 | 3.3 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 135 | 129 | 6 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age, Guatemala or Sur?
- Guatemala, at 136 against 129 in Sur as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age between Guatemala and Sur?
- 7, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sur?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Guatemala and Sur rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age?
- Guatemala ranks 1st and Sur ranks 1st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.