Costa Rica vs Nicaragua: Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age
Costa Rica
131
in 2019
Nicaragua
131
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
18th
Nicaragua rank
18th
Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age over time
- Costa Rica
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 131 against 131 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 18th and Nicaragua ranks 18th of 194 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 130.9 | 130 | 0.9 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 131.9 | 131.8 | 0.1 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age, Costa Rica or Nicaragua?
- Costa Rica, at 131 against 131 in Nicaragua as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age between Costa Rica and Nicaragua?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Nicaragua?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Nicaragua rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age?
- Costa Rica ranks 18th and Nicaragua ranks 18th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.