Costa Rica vs Malta: Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age
Costa Rica
131
in 2019
Malta
131
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
18th
Malta rank
18th
Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age over time
- Costa Rica
- Malta
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 131 against 131 in Malta, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malta ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 18th and Malta ranks 18th of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 130.9 | 131 | 0.1 | Malta |
| 2010s | 131.9 | 131 | 0.9 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age, Costa Rica or Malta?
- Costa Rica, at 131 against 131 in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age between Costa Rica and Malta?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Malta?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Malta rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age?
- Costa Rica ranks 18th and Malta ranks 18th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.