Australia vs Western Pacific (WHO region): Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age
Australia
133
in 2019
Western Pacific (WHO region)
132
in 2019
Australia rank
4th
Western Pacific (WHO region) rank
1st
Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age over time
- Australia
- Western Pacific (WHO region)
How they compare
Australia currently reports 133 against 132 in Western Pacific (WHO region), a difference of 1.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 4th and Western Pacific (WHO region) ranks 1st of 194 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Western Pacific (WHO region) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 133 | 130.1 | 2.9 | Australia |
| 2010s | 133 | 131.8 | 1.2 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age, Australia or Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- Australia, at 133 against 132 in Western Pacific (WHO region) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age between Australia and Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- 1, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Western Pacific (WHO region)?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Western Pacific (WHO region) rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age?
- Australia ranks 4th and Western Pacific (WHO region) ranks 1st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.