Australia vs South-East Asia (WHO region): Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age
Australia
133
in 2019
South-East Asia (WHO region)
119
in 2019
Australia rank
4th
South-East Asia (WHO region) rank
7th
Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age over time
- Australia
- South-East Asia (WHO region)
How they compare
Australia currently reports 133 against 119 in South-East Asia (WHO region), a difference of 14.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times South-East Asia (WHO region)'s.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 4th and South-East Asia (WHO region) ranks 7th of 194 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | South-East Asia (WHO region) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 133 | 118.8 | 14.2 | Australia |
| 2010s | 133 | 119 | 14 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age, Australia or South-East Asia (WHO region)?
- Australia, at 133 against 119 in South-East Asia (WHO region) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age between Australia and South-East Asia (WHO region)?
- 14, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and South-East Asia (WHO region)?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Australia and South-East Asia (WHO region) rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age?
- Australia ranks 4th and South-East Asia (WHO region) ranks 7th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.