Australia vs Guatemala: Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age
Australia
133
in 2019
Guatemala
136
in 2019
Australia rank
4th
Guatemala rank
1st
Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age over time
- Australia
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 136 against 133 in Australia, a difference of 3.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 4th and Guatemala ranks 1st of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 133 | 130.8 | 2.2 | Australia |
| 2010s | 133 | 135 | 2 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age, Australia or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 136 against 133 in Australia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age between Australia and Guatemala?
- 3, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Guatemala?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Guatemala rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age?
- Australia ranks 4th and Guatemala ranks 1st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.