Australia vs Canada: Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age
Australia
133
in 2019
Canada
132
in 2019
Australia rank
4th
Canada rank
7th
Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age over time
- Australia
- Canada
How they compare
Australia currently reports 133 against 132 in Canada, a difference of 1.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Canada ahead.
Australia ranks 4th and Canada ranks 7th of 194 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 133 | 133 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 133 | 132.3 | 0.7 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age, Australia or Canada?
- Australia, at 133 against 132 in Canada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age between Australia and Canada?
- 1, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Canada?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Canada rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age?
- Australia ranks 4th and Canada ranks 7th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.