AMR vs Guatemala: Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age
AMR
131
in 2019
Guatemala
136
in 2019
AMR rank
3rd
Guatemala rank
1st
Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age over time
- AMR
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 136 against 131 in AMR, a difference of 5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was AMR ahead.
AMR ranks 3rd and Guatemala ranks 1st of 13 groups.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AMR | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 130.5 | 130.8 | 0.3 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 131 | 135 | 4 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age, AMR or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 136 against 131 in AMR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age between AMR and Guatemala?
- 5, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AMR and Guatemala?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do AMR and Guatemala rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age?
- AMR ranks 3rd and Guatemala ranks 1st of 13 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.