South Sudan vs Sri Lanka: Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women
South Sudan
124
in 2019
Sri Lanka
124
in 2019
South Sudan rank
140th
Sri Lanka rank
140th
Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women over time
- South Sudan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 124 against 124 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 140th and Sri Lanka ranks 140th of 194 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 124.1 | 123.2 | 0.9 | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 124.9 | 124 | 0.9 | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women, South Sudan or Sri Lanka?
- South Sudan, at 124 against 124 in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women between South Sudan and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Sri Lanka?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do South Sudan and Sri Lanka rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women?
- South Sudan ranks 140th and Sri Lanka ranks 140th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.