Nicaragua vs South-East Asia (WHO region): Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women
Nicaragua
132
in 2019
South-East Asia (WHO region)
120
in 2019
Nicaragua rank
9th
South-East Asia (WHO region) rank
12th
Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women over time
- Nicaragua
- South-East Asia (WHO region)
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 132 against 120 in South-East Asia (WHO region), a difference of 12.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times South-East Asia (WHO region)'s.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Nicaragua ranks 9th and South-East Asia (WHO region) ranks 12th of 194 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | South-East Asia (WHO region) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 130.9 | 119.1 | 11.8 | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 132.2 | 120 | 12.2 | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women, Nicaragua or South-East Asia (WHO region)?
- Nicaragua, at 132 against 120 in South-East Asia (WHO region) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women between Nicaragua and South-East Asia (WHO region)?
- 12, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and South-East Asia (WHO region)?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Nicaragua and South-East Asia (WHO region) rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women?
- Nicaragua ranks 9th and South-East Asia (WHO region) ranks 12th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.