New Zealand vs SEAR: Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women
New Zealand
132
in 2019
SEAR
120
in 2019
New Zealand rank
9th
SEAR rank
12th
Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women over time
- New Zealand
- SEAR
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 132 against 120 in SEAR, a difference of 12.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times SEAR's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 9th and SEAR ranks 12th of 194 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | SEAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 133.1 | 119.1 | 14 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 132.2 | 120 | 12.2 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women, New Zealand or SEAR?
- New Zealand, at 132 against 120 in SEAR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women between New Zealand and SEAR?
- 12, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and SEAR?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and SEAR rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women?
- New Zealand ranks 9th and SEAR ranks 12th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.