Mauritius vs Namibia: Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women
Mauritius
129
in 2019
Namibia
129
in 2019
Mauritius rank
64th
Namibia rank
64th
Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women over time
- Mauritius
- Namibia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 129 against 129 in Namibia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 64th and Namibia ranks 64th of 194 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 131.9 | 127.9 | 4 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 130.3 | 129 | 1.3 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women, Mauritius or Namibia?
- Mauritius, at 129 against 129 in Namibia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women between Mauritius and Namibia?
- 0, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women?
- Mauritius ranks 64th and Namibia ranks 64th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.