Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women
Costa Rica
132
in 2019
New Zealand
132
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
9th
New Zealand rank
9th
Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women over time
- Costa Rica
- New Zealand
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 132 against 132 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 20 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 9th and New Zealand ranks 9th of 194 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 131.3 | 133.1 | 1.8 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 132 | 132.2 | 0.2 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women, Costa Rica or New Zealand?
- Costa Rica, at 132 against 132 in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women between Costa Rica and New Zealand?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and New Zealand?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and New Zealand rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women?
- Costa Rica ranks 9th and New Zealand ranks 9th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.